PDA

View Full Version : [Firmware] 2.0 Beta - Who got it ? (No links)


sam
03-07-2008, 01:07 PM
Does any of you have 2.0 beta seed? Tell us your impressions here!

mdfreeman
03-07-2008, 03:26 PM
I am going to sign up for the $99 developer program as I want to develop some caller list blocking applications.

No good running that on a simulator, so any help with getting the 2.0 beta would be good :-)

ridderdk
03-07-2008, 03:51 PM
I am going to sign up for the $99 developer program as I want to develop some caller list blocking applications.

No good running that on a simulator, so any help with getting the 2.0 beta would be good :-)

If you succeed in signing up for the Developer program, you will automatically get the beta 2.0 firmware, at least that's how i understand the terms.

matt77
03-07-2008, 04:34 PM
Yes but it's strange i saw nobody with the FW 2.0 beta...

sam
03-07-2008, 04:41 PM
As far we know, it's not yet even been handed out to developers. It will take some time, in the meantime we will wait o:)

matt77
03-07-2008, 05:12 PM
OK, for clarify, currently we can't test SDK Apps on iPhone without the FW 2.0 beta ? even if we had the 99$ licence ?

cchance
03-07-2008, 05:19 PM
the 99$ license is supposed to give people access to it but i dont think anyones got it.... hopefully once someone does it will leak and get cracked so we can get it on jailbrake phones, and get some sdk goodness rolling.

CAUSE JUNE IS FARRRRR AWAY!

slimnickyy
03-07-2008, 05:34 PM
the 99$ license is supposed to give people access to it but i dont think anyones got it.... hopefully once someone does it will leak and get cracked so we can get it on jailbrake phones, and get some sdk goodness rolling.

CAUSE JUNE IS FARRRRR AWAY!

$99 gives ability to upload your apps to Apple for the app store. Apps are to be tested with the SDK aspen simulator. 2.0 is reserved for beta trials within chosen US companies. 2.0 will not likely be released to developers even if you pay the $99 until it's ready (June).

Thus either someone within apple needs to leak it, or someone within a chosen company working with the beta firmware needs to leak it. As of now we know AOL, EA games, likely Google, but others will follow as the program gets going.

sam
03-07-2008, 05:37 PM
"Announcing the iPhone Enterprise Beta Program: a unique opportunity for IT departments to try iPhone 2.0 software before general release. If your company is selected to participate, you’ll test new iPhone enterprise features within your corporate environment, then provide Apple with valuable feedback. Interested? Click below to apply."

http://www.apple.com/iphone/enterprise/

Number_41
03-07-2008, 06:54 PM
...Wish I had it.

I wonder if the 2.0 licensed to the developers will have their name signed onto the firmware. That way if we got it and so did Apple, they would be able to identify the source and basically....sue them for leaking the firmware.

Makes you wonder..

N41

meagain
03-07-2008, 07:45 PM
Seriously, looking at the application to get 2.0 beta, I'm thinking it wouldn't be hard at all to get it? Certainly no harm in trying.

http://www.apple.com/iphone/enterprise/apply/

Am I missing something?

Lisa

)law(
03-07-2008, 07:56 PM
i am just left wondering if we can still jailbreak and get the usigned apps to work with apple ones, because when you think about it, no jailbreak pretty much means no unlock and no unlock means all those people in unsupported countries are screwed except for x sim. Sorry if i got off track, wonder if there will be any unmentioned new features when june rolls around?

neonkoala
03-07-2008, 07:57 PM
Well first you need to be in a position in your company to be able to apply and Apple are sure to do a background check on all companies so if you're just a small PC repair firm with 8 employees they're not going to accept you.

meagain
03-07-2008, 08:05 PM
Neon- How do you know though? Do we really know what the qualifications are? Do we really know if a company even working out of a home with 2 people - won't be accepted?
Until someone tries and gets rejected - I'm withholding judgement.

Spinstorm
03-07-2008, 09:00 PM
Why don't a few members of the dev team get together and decide to make a company and base it out of one of their homes?

Then you have at least 5 developers that can ACTUALLY give apple feedback on the SDK that you require should they be accepted.

Its one thing to lie in the application but if your accepted and can't do what Apple want then they won't send you what we all want!

There is nothing to lose that way - and if they come up with something interesting to Apple between them they may get accepted!

jacky668
03-07-2008, 09:20 PM
Any word on when the 2.0 best FW will be relased to beta tester? I mean the SDK is out already, so people can not test until FW2.0 is relased. And do you think FW2.0 beta only works for beta test iphone or it works for any iphone? :rolleyes:

neonkoala
03-07-2008, 09:26 PM
Neon- How do you know though? Do we really know what the qualifications are? Do we really know if a company even working out of a home with 2 people - won't be accepted?
Until someone tries and gets rejected - I'm withholding judgement.

Have a look at the site it says a minimum of 5 members are needed in the testing team alone. Also "Enterprise" kinda gives it away, enterprises are usually defined as being companies with several hundred employees at least.

jacky668
03-07-2008, 10:11 PM
You don't need to set up an Enterprise company to get the beta, all you need is to know somebody from Enterprise that has it. I dont think apple is restricted about allowing ppl to share FW2.0 without actually connecting to APP. It still in beta mode. Tons bugs anyway.

lf4
03-07-2008, 10:22 PM
In iPhone SDK directory /Developer/Platforms/Aspen.platform/Developer/SDKs/Aspen1.2sdk is probably fw2.0 frameworks and compiled apps (appstore, ...)

lordimac
03-07-2008, 10:25 PM
Try it, this bricked my Firmware :)

meagain
03-07-2008, 11:09 PM
Neon - I'm not seeing a minimum of 5 requirement. Unless we are looking at 2 different sections. Where are you seeing this?

neonkoala
03-07-2008, 11:34 PM
Neon - I'm not seeing a minimum of 5 requirement. Unless we are looking at 2 different sections. Where are you seeing this?

Sorry misread, maximum of 5. However the enterprise bit still applies.

KRAYZIE
03-10-2008, 12:24 AM
Does it seem likley that the firmware will leak onto torrent sites? :confused:

hquest
03-10-2008, 02:57 AM
No, it seems like is not out yet.

Digbave
03-10-2008, 04:00 AM
Should the firmware be leeked and jailbroken/activated/ unlocked i don't think it would be the best idea to release the firmware here and have people unlocking it as this will just meen in junewhen the non beta is released apple would have fixed the exploits

ram0135
03-10-2008, 09:01 PM
I have the 2.0 IPSW file that an anonymous source gave me.. I installed it but iTunes won't activate unless you're registered as an iPhone dev and register your equipment. I think it could in theory be activated if someone got a hold of it. I won't post links here but if you're interested, let me know. I'll post a screen shot of the error when I get home.

neonkoala
03-10-2008, 09:25 PM
I have the 2.0 IPSW file that an anonymous source gave me.. I installed it but iTunes won't activate unless you're registered as an iPhone dev and register your equipment. I think it could in theory be activated if someone got a hold of it. I won't post links here but if you're interested, let me know. I'll post a screen shot of the error when I get home.

Have you PM'ed sam or NerveGas? One of those or other Admins would be a good place to start.

sam
03-10-2008, 09:29 PM
If possible, please contact me in this matter via pm, thanks!

KRAYZIE
03-11-2008, 12:11 AM
I have the 2.0 IPSW file that an anonymous source gave me.. I installed it but iTunes won't activate unless you're registered as an iPhone dev and register your equipment. I think it could in theory be activated if someone got a hold of it. I won't post links here but if you're interested, let me know. I'll post a screen shot of the error when I get home.


That's 40 different kinds of awesome if your telling the truth and actually have it.

Your a total douche if your lying though. :)

2wired
03-11-2008, 12:14 AM
seems to be leaked.
a german speaking guy posted that pic ;) on a german iPhone board.
not telling a punk out of how he got that...
http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/6260/screen200hr9.jpg

his signature says iPhone, USA, 2.0.0, 05.05.02_H, BL 5.0

//moderator: seems to be fake tho , installer app on 2.0 ?

KRAYZIE
03-11-2008, 12:16 AM
seems to be leaked.
a german speaking guy posted that pic ;) on a german iPhone board.
not telling a punk out of how he got that...
http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/6260/screen200hr9.jpg


I can't believe how gullible people are...


Ok so let me get this straight...

1. He somehow has it jailbreaked and activated already eh?

2. All the apps work just fine? Even though we know the frameworks changed? Cool.

3. We know the firmware is actually 1.2, not 2.0.. hm.


Jesus christ.

2wired
03-11-2008, 12:24 AM
ah yes... and where do you found words like "true, definitely or sure, or confirmed..."

i wrote it SEEMS, of course i can't confirm it by having a look on that pic.
also i am not that dude sitting in front of my iPhone for months. still have to work ;)
but of course i am interested in FW 2.0.0

btw: sorry for my bad english, it is not as good as it was about 10 years ago.

ram0135
03-11-2008, 12:28 AM
Hello All,

I have received quite a bit of replies to my message about the new firmware! I have sent the firmware to the appropriate admins and will be holding off sending it to anyone else for the time being. Don't want something this good to be patched up now, do we?!

And as far as the screenshot earlier in this thread about the german iphone, people are correct, the real version is "1.2" and the version number in the parenthesis is also different from the beta version. Not saying it's not true, but...

-Ram0135

KRAYZIE
03-11-2008, 12:31 AM
ah yes... and where do you found words like "true, definitely or sure, or confirmed..."

i wrote it SEEMS, of course i can't confirm it by having a look on that pic.
also i am not that dude sitting in front of my iPhone for months. still have to work ;)
but of course i am interested in FW 2.0.0

btw: sorry for my bad english, it is not as good as it was about 10 years ago.


Why write at all? You should have enough intelligince to know that is fake as hell.

If I post a photoshopped picture of Jessica Alba sucking my dick, are you going to believe me and begin to tell others? No, your going to say no way, and move on.

chrisc9867
03-11-2008, 12:33 AM
That is a terrible photoshop....

piranha
03-11-2008, 12:34 AM
How would we know it would be yours sucked? ;)

n350z
03-11-2008, 12:36 AM
That is a terrible photoshop....

Mine is better :D

http://img363.imageshack.us/img363/1884/screen2200hr9vn6.jpg

2wired
03-11-2008, 12:36 AM
ok ok, i understood and i am sorry for that.
i am just reading through different boards and sadly the pic was posted one minute before the posting by ram0135 ...

seems to be, that i became crazy about the possibilities

SoLoR
03-11-2008, 12:41 AM
I have received quite a bit of replies to my message about the new firmware! I have sent the firmware to the appropriate admins and will be holding off sending it to anyone else for the time being. Don't want something this good to be patched up now, do we?!


nothing can be patched since nothing was discovered... and i doubt anyone will share discoverys before offical release... anyway if its real it will be on torrents in day or two anyway, so what would actualy matter if some people would get it day or two earlyer? :)

PS: we are bored! we need something to play around a bit!

chrisc9867
03-11-2008, 12:58 AM
PS: we are bored! we need something to play around a bit!

Go call up ADC and ask them why their website is so slow :mad:

ram0135
03-11-2008, 01:09 AM
nothing can be patched since nothing was discovered... and i doubt anyone will share discoverys before offical release... anyway if its real it will be on torrents in day or two anyway, so what would actualy matter if some people would get it day or two earlyer? :)

PS: we are bored! we need something to play around a bit!

I hear you. lol. But apart from the risk of having things patched, there's also the possibility that Apple has watermarked the file. I don't want my source to be compromised.. Just relax, freedom is on the horizon :)

-Ram0135

SoLoR
03-11-2008, 01:37 AM
1.2 beta seems released yes, heared from multiple sources... so someone with adc enterprise access share somehow? not like its signed, since its released publickly....

chrisc9867
03-11-2008, 01:42 AM
Even though I am all for the development, I think that it is a little dangerous for the individual who releases it. It is probably digitally signed to the ligit owner.

SoLoR
03-11-2008, 01:44 AM
Even though I am all for the development, I think that it is a little dangerous for the individual who releases it. It is probably digitally signed to the ligit owner.

i seriously doubt apple is chaining download files "on the fly", they would have so many broken downloads that way...

KRAYZIE
03-11-2008, 05:11 AM
Let's get this up onto the pirate bay, seriously. I can't wait until fucking June.

Jeffx28
03-11-2008, 05:37 AM
I would just like the use of WPA Enterprise....wifi on campus cant wait:)

ahduke99
03-11-2008, 05:55 AM
that would be nice. PUSH email is mainly what I am looking for. i doubt apple will go after people downloading this. they are taking the risk of installing it , and it will be a free update when it is released. i hope this gets posted on the torrents soon.

chrisc9867
03-11-2008, 05:59 AM
I am guessing there is a bigger reason to why they are not releasing it to the developers other than those who have been "lucky enough" to be qualified.

sam
03-11-2008, 12:18 PM
ram0135's ipsw is real, we asked him to keep it confidenal now, not jsut only because it is digitaly signed as most developer give-aways from apple (i.e. stuff you get from your adc as well) also because we need a relaiable review upon this "new thing" first.
From what we already know, 2.0 ipsw is useless to the common iphone user as it requires yu to activate. Any attemp to upgrade your phone with a unauthorized ipsw distribution may leave your phone in a unusable state.

Otaviano_09
03-11-2008, 12:31 PM
Nice, hope you guys get Pwned working on it. I've been patiently holding off on upgrading my 1.1.2 TurboSIM (4.6 BL) iPhone for a solution that really feels safe. Hopefully Pwned is what I've been waiting for.

ChronicProductions
03-11-2008, 01:55 PM
Yeah, the iPhone won't activate for anyone that doesn't have their device registered, even though there is no way to register it because when you click the link in iTunes it just shoots you back to the main iPhone Dev Center.

CycloneFr
03-11-2008, 04:36 PM
need to be hacked then :) cheers to semthex !

ram0135
03-11-2008, 04:52 PM
Yeah, the iPhone won't activate for anyone that doesn't have their device registered, even though there is no way to register it because when you click the link in iTunes it just shoots you back to the main iPhone Dev Center.

Yep. Exactly the case. Here's a screen of what you would get if you got it to install:
Click (http://img296.imageshack.us/my.php?image=errorgq8.jpg)

-Ram0135

ChronicProductions
03-11-2008, 09:29 PM
Yep. Exactly the case. Here's a screen of what you would get if you got it to install:
Click (http://img296.imageshack.us/my.php?image=errorgq8.jpg)

-Ram0135

Yep, I got the same one. I found it interesting that the slide for emergency screen had a pink background instead of black like it usually does in 1.1.1+. If you want to get into mobile phone, do slide for emergency, and hook it up to your computer. while you are on the slide for emergency keypad, rename the device on the side thing in iTunes and it will get confused, first going to the main screen then to MobilePhone. From there I got to check out the Preferences.app (add a contact with prefs: as a url). New baseband, parental controls, a new 'Calender' menu, and that's all I can tell so far.

Macom2008
03-11-2008, 11:37 PM
Did you see the the Exchange integration in the MobileMail app ?

ahduke99
03-12-2008, 12:01 AM
is it registered by the iphone's serial or IMEI number? It might be tough to crack.

hemiola
03-12-2008, 12:16 AM
Naw, this will not be so hard to crack...

ttgol
03-12-2008, 12:21 AM
I remember the iphone was bypassed for activation within a week after I got my iphone on June 30 last year. It will be interesting to see how long this is going to take. I see a few groups of 2.0 beta users:

1. Developers who want to start testing the new app in iphone who did not get into the developer program.
2. End users who want to get some of the 2.0 features now - Exchange support, Cisco VPN, etc.
3. Hackers who want to start working on 2.0 jailbreak/unlock etc.

I agree we should wait for the developers to have a chance to "look" into the beta firmware before they become widespread. I think depend on who you are and what you are planning to do with the firmware give it a few more days/weeks. I am sure someone will make this happen.

Good luck to the people who got the beta firmware.

thecompkid
03-12-2008, 12:36 AM
There is no way of ensuring that the FW isn't watermarked, so I doubt that this file should ever be released unless the source isn't worried about a potential lawsuit. Realize that the watermark could be anywhere, and it won't be recognizable as such either.

KRAYZIE
03-12-2008, 01:14 AM
Hack away hackers!

MacDragon
03-12-2008, 01:32 AM
well, once a few independent people have got hold of the firmware they can compare MD5's, if they match, then it clearly isn't watermarked?

nilsou
03-12-2008, 01:33 AM
We could totally know if the file is watermarked :

Just take the firmware file from two different people, and compare it byte by byte.

If there is ANY difference, then it IS watermarked, if not please release it!

my 2 cents...

maidstonelad
03-12-2008, 01:59 AM
Thinkin the iPhone-Dev team have already jailbroken it :)

Thanks to Z00L for posting this,

Updated: http://iphone-dev.org/main

http://bayimg.com/HAjLgaaBc

Number_41
03-12-2008, 02:24 AM
I think i see 1.2 in the versions area..

N41

n350z
03-12-2008, 02:58 AM
I think i see 1.2 in the versions area..

N41

I think you are right

have a look at this I'd say its something 04 BB firmware as well

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/1899/hajlgaabccopyqx9.jpg

ChronicProductions
03-12-2008, 03:59 AM
Aw man I was getting a video ready and everything! Oh well, since the news have already been broken I'll get a video ready and give you guys a walkthrough of the firmware :) (The method can not be spoken of at this time though)

Just as a note, at the time there is a side effect of the phone getting no signal.

ChronicProductions
03-12-2008, 04:01 AM
I think you are right

have a look at this I'd say its something 04 BB firmware as well

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/1899/hajlgaabccopyqx9.jpg

The firmware is 04.05.**_G (Don't know if the last two numbers would give away the source of this [Well, we know who the source is, but I mean his source])

Number_41
03-12-2008, 05:03 AM
Chronic

post the video

Would be nice to see it

N41

KRAYZIE
03-12-2008, 05:16 AM
Please post the video. :)

hemiola
03-12-2008, 06:12 AM
Err, no signal ....hmmmmm

ahduke99
03-12-2008, 06:12 AM
I just want to use the PUSH email. I am eager to see if this thing can be activated and leaked. Also, does the copy includ the appstore in which AIM and such can be downloaded, or is that all not up and running till June?

ttgol
03-12-2008, 06:24 AM
This is getting exciting!! I can't wait to see the video of the new 2.0 features. Also can't wait until the developers crack it!

Spinstorm
03-12-2008, 06:40 AM
Im guessing the lockdownd isn't patched yet!

ttgol
03-12-2008, 04:03 PM
Now the news of 2.0 jailbreak is all over the iphone sites this morning, it begs the question of "now what?" I am glad the 2.0 firmware can be jailbreak when 2.0 is out in June. What about the next few months? Do you think we can get the 2.0 beta firmware before June? I think it is illegal to provide the beta firmware.

I really hope that we can get the 2.0 beta firmware soon!!!

kultschar
03-12-2008, 05:52 PM
True but what benefit would we really have using 2.0 until it is officially released with the apps and app store!?

ttgol
03-12-2008, 05:57 PM
Exchange Activesync
Cisco VPN
802.1x
Powerpoint reader
etc

Just heard 2.0 beta is also unlocked.

davpel
03-12-2008, 06:02 PM
I have to agree with ttgol on this one. I'm on the edge (no pun intended) seat waiting to finally be able to use Exchange AS.

CycloneFr
03-12-2008, 07:17 PM
PPT reader would be awesome.
Also it means we can start writing SDK apps such as emulator runnning OPENGL ES !
that would give us advance / Apple.
Im guessing if appstore apps are available? :)

ubik
03-12-2008, 07:24 PM
so, is there somewhere a download link? torrent or http what ever?

kultschar
03-12-2008, 07:48 PM
so, is there somewhere a download link? torrent or http what ever?

Nope and I dont think we will see this hacked until after the official release in June!

ubik
03-12-2008, 07:49 PM
why don't you think? everything will be on torrent someday before.

kultschar
03-12-2008, 07:53 PM
Sorry thats not quite what I meant - I agree the firmware will prob be leaked soon however I wouldnt mind betting we wont see the jailbreak solution from the Devs until Apple release the official thing in June!

(unless somebody leaks it or figures it out seperately)

ubik
03-12-2008, 07:55 PM
ziphone works on 2.0 beta..


"GOOD NEWS.
ZiPhone has been proved
to work on 2.0 beta firmware

I will not release a new version
until it will be officially out.
I am not as stupid as other people."


http://www.ziphone.org/

kultschar
03-12-2008, 08:06 PM
Oh well guess its a matter of time until the firmware is leaked to everybody!

By Friday I reckon!!

kultschar
03-12-2008, 08:08 PM
Will it wirelessly sync Outlook details on standalone PCs or will it require exchange server???

KRAYZIE
03-12-2008, 09:03 PM
Is it possible to recieve service (if your not a true 1.2 firmware owner) with the 1.2 firmware now, or has that not been figured out yet?

Z00L
03-12-2008, 11:09 PM
ziphone works on 2.0 beta..


"GOOD NEWS.
ZiPhone has been proved
to work on 2.0 beta firmware

I will not release a new version
until it will be officially out.
I am not as stupid as other people."


http://www.ziphone.org/

That is a complete lie.
The ramdisk exploit as it is, doesn't work anymore.

It's all marketing to keep fools hoping, and donating.

Former Bender
03-13-2008, 12:23 AM
I will not release a new version
until it will be officially out.
I am not as stupid as other people.

I wonder who he's talking about :D

Izzard
03-13-2008, 01:52 AM
Here's a new Wikipedia entry for ZiPhone (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor's_New_Clothes).

Z00L
03-13-2008, 03:12 AM
I wonder who he's talking about :D

About his donators? :D :D :D

KRAYZIE
03-13-2008, 03:14 AM
Well, I guess all I wanna ask is..

Does anyone see the dev team or anyone in general, getting this on torrent sites so that we can download and upgrade our phones and faux activate them before it's offical release? I really really really would like to be able to take advantage of that exchange support.

iDarbert
03-13-2008, 03:22 AM
Well, I guess all I wanna ask is..

Does anyone see the dev team or anyone in general, getting this on torrent sites so that we can download and upgrade our phones and faux activate them before it's offical release? I really really really would like to be able to take advantage of that exchange support.

As much as I'd love that I don't see it happening anytime soon, Apple has zero tollerance on pre-release software and I'm afraid it would only bring trouble to the dev-team is something like that was done.
Perhaps if someone else shared the 2.0 beta firmware and the dev-team told us how to jailbreak/activate, but I find that unlikely to happen too.

I think we'll just have to wait.

KRAYZIE
03-13-2008, 03:26 AM
Then my interest is done here I suppose. See you all in June. >_<

GenesisDH
03-13-2008, 05:16 AM
Will it wirelessly sync Outlook details on standalone PCs or will it require exchange server???Just over Exchange. ActiveSync OTA syncing has been limited to Exchange for over a year now. If you can always use a email provider like mail2web and have ActiveSync OTA usability. Then link it to Outlook itself as a workaround syncing solution.

ubik
03-13-2008, 10:40 AM
That is a complete lie.
The ramdisk exploit as it is, doesn't work anymore.

It's all marketing to keep fools hoping, and donating.

Maybe it is. But i don't believe the dev teams jailbreak/activate stuff because of one screenshot either..

xSpiTx
03-13-2008, 11:15 AM
is there any release of the software for ipod touch? jw ty :)

StefanM
03-13-2008, 11:26 AM
I read on macnews.de today that the DevTeam already jailbroken the 1.2 Firmware which will be release in June as 2.0 :-)

So we only need the software to put it on out phones :-)

kultschar
03-13-2008, 02:23 PM
I read on macnews.de today that the DevTeam already jailbroken the 1.2 Firmware which will be release in June as 2.0 :-)

So we only need the software to put it on out phones :-)

Beleive it is very buggy and loads of crashes according to Sam & MAx. Dont think it oudl be worth putting on your phone until Apple release the official one in June, sounds like everything has been rushed just to get the SDK pack out

jashsayani
03-13-2008, 06:03 PM
I heard there is going to be a patch for 1.1.2 where MS Exchange support will be added. Will soon see the patch in Installer!

DevTeam is on it!

cchance
03-13-2008, 06:10 PM
why not release a the crack for 1.2, and leave it up to the nefarious types to find the 1.2 firmware... you know it'll eventually leak in the usual backwater channels *cough* BT *cough* ... eventually

davpel
03-13-2008, 06:52 PM
I heard there is going to be a patch for 1.1.2 where MS Exchange support will be added. Will soon see the patch in Installer!

DevTeam is on it!

Where did you hear this? That would be outstanding! Can anyone else confirm this information?

compuguy1088
03-13-2008, 06:57 PM
I heard there is going to be a patch for 1.1.2 where MS Exchange support will be added. Will soon see the patch in Installer!

DevTeam is on it!

I was looking more towards 802.11x, WPA and WPA2 Enterprise features from the 2.0 beta more than the exchange support...

amanb
03-13-2008, 07:01 PM
I can't believe how gullible people are...


Ok so let me get this straight...

1. He somehow has it jailbreaked and activated already eh?

2. All the apps work just fine? Even though we know the frameworks changed? Cool.

3. We know the firmware is actually 1.2, not 2.0.. hm.


Jesus christ.

WOW GOOD Try! its ez to change the version # on the iPhone. I my self have changed it theres a File Located in system and i think Core systems. If any one want to know how to do PM and i can help

kultschar
03-13-2008, 07:05 PM
why not release a the crack for 1.2, and leave it up to the nefarious types to find the 1.2 firmware... you know it'll eventually leak in the usual backwater channels *cough* BT *cough* ... eventually

Prob because if they release the crack then Apple will know what exploit they used and close it when they release the real deal in June!! The Beta is very very buggy I believe also!

rustymetal
03-13-2008, 11:17 PM
$600 and a year later we might have a restricted SDK

/sigh

hemiola
03-14-2008, 04:19 AM
I don't know, guys .... i haven't seen enough to prove that this is really working ... fuzzy video, etc.

These guys don't have a decent still camera to take some shots?

Where's the exchange preference screen? The new calender interface?

sam
03-14-2008, 09:17 AM
there is a thread in general showing you all the new stuff also picture wise.

ChronicProductions
03-15-2008, 05:02 AM
there is a thread in general showing you all the new stuff also picture wise.

Hey sam I heard you got signal working on 1.2 mind shooting me a PM with more details? I'm stuck on the 1.2 with the no signal wizdaz-ified lockdownd that just gets to springboard

chrisc9867
03-15-2008, 11:02 AM
So it is finally out? Where can the common people get it? I dont really care about signal...I got a few extra iPhones sitting around. Just want to dev on it.

SoLoR
03-15-2008, 12:16 PM
Hey sam I heard you got signal working on 1.2 mind shooting me a PM with more details? I'm stuck on the 1.2 with the no signal wizdaz-ified lockdownd that just gets to springboard

make your "anysim" unlock ;)

Neo0019
03-15-2008, 09:27 PM
I mean I have developed 3 almost 4 Native iphone apps using the iphone SDK from apple. If apple has released the 2.0 to selected developers apple must also be expecting the software to leak, is only natural IT WILL HAPPEN! Why not do it now let other developers test their apps and see how it goes. I mean 500+ headas is alot better than 500-.

ubik
03-16-2008, 09:09 PM
aawww... i want the leaked FW 1.2 beta..

Izzard
03-16-2008, 09:48 PM
aawww... i want the leaked FW 1.2 beta..

OK now I'm going to have a bit of a winge and a moan. I am sure someone will tell me off for saying this, but here goes:

I subscribe to threads like this so that I get emails notifying me of new replies. This is useful because often people reply with new information, findings, screenshots, links to articles, videos, answers to questions or at least they ask interesting questions that have not been asked before.

So I'm getting really fed up with replies like "awww... i want it".

Sorry. Sorry for complaining. I must have got out of the wrong side of bed to be moaning about little thread replies that don't add anything to the conversation. Please don't flame me.

slimnickyy
03-16-2008, 10:39 PM
As much as I'd love that I don't see it happening anytime soon, Apple has zero tollerance on pre-release software and I'm afraid it would only bring trouble to the dev-team is something like that was done.
Perhaps if someone else shared the 2.0 beta firmware and the dev-team told us how to jailbreak/activate, but I find that unlikely to happen too.

I think we'll just have to wait.

Remember Leopard beta's all over the torrents? I do. Remember how Leopard final was out on torrents 2 days prior to official retail launch AND before developer's had it on ADC? I do. It will happen.

ubik
03-17-2008, 12:27 AM
OK now I'm going to have a bit of a winge and a moan. I am sure someone will tell me off for saying this, but here goes:

I subscribe to threads like this so that I get emails notifying me of new replies. This is useful because often people reply with new information, findings, screenshots, links to articles, videos, answers to questions or at least they ask interesting questions that have not been asked before.

So I'm getting really fed up with replies like "awww... i want it".

Sorry. Sorry for complaining. I must have got out of the wrong side of bed to be moaning about little thread replies that don't add anything to the conversation. Please don't flame me.

So there is another subscription now.
Don't flame on me, if you don't want to get flamed on!

I just was disapointed that it is still not released. Nothing else. Btw. Your post gives no more info than mine. So.....


So long..

StefanM
03-17-2008, 05:38 PM
I also want the 1.2 Beta Version....

I need Exchange Support. The faster the better for me..... That syncing with cable really sucks me off

aqua bass
03-17-2008, 09:24 PM
That syncing with cable really sucks me off


:eek: Dude I want a cable that does THAT for me!!!

:D Sorry couldn't help myself. I'll behave from now on.

ChronicProductions
03-17-2008, 09:46 PM
:eek: Dude I want a cable that does THAT for me!!!

:D Sorry couldn't help myself. I'll behave from now on.

'That's what SHE said' would have been an adequate response, but I commend you for trying, my good sir.

iDarbert
03-21-2008, 02:40 AM
Remember Leopard beta's all over the torrents? I do. Remember how Leopard final was out on torrents 2 days prior to official retail launch AND before developer's had it on ADC? I do. It will happen.

The Leopard betas were not trackable, they were the same disk image for everyone.
I'm not sure if the iPhone Beta Program is any different but my bet is that there is some way to identify the owner of the leaked firmware.

It's probably the same for everyone though, I just have a gut feeling this is not gonna happen.

sam
03-21-2008, 10:06 PM
Leopard beta s everything you get from apple is sigitally signed to the member account. Leopard bets were as well but it is nowhere made public so ... no one knew and fall for it. Serval people lost their accounts on aDC for leaking of leoaprd betas, not a well known fact but hey.

chrisc9867
03-22-2008, 07:21 AM
The Leopard betas were not trackable, they were the same disk image for everyone.
I'm not sure if the iPhone Beta Program is any different but my bet is that there is some way to identify the owner of the leaked firmware.

It's probably the same for everyone though, I just have a gut feeling this is not gonna happen.

How are people so convinced that the Leopard betas were not trackable?

hemiola
03-22-2008, 04:59 PM
A checksum was ran on several different sources of 1.2 - completely identical ... byte-for-byte .... so how would they be trackable ????

AriX
03-22-2008, 06:11 PM
Has anyone who has 1.2 gotten SSH running? I have it, and I can't get it working :(

PM me

sam
03-22-2008, 06:37 PM
A checksum was ran on several different sources of 1.2 - completely identical ... byte-for-byte .... so how would they be trackable ????

This is kinda a wacky tale, if you look on the net how rarely 1.2 was even given to developers.

ChronicProductions
03-22-2008, 06:48 PM
Has anyone who has 1.2 gotten SSH running? I have it, and I can't get it working :(

PM me

Only the guys with the new Pwnage Tool man, and they aren't telling me

chrisc9867
03-22-2008, 08:08 PM
A checksum was ran on several different sources of 1.2 - completely identical ... byte-for-byte .... so how would they be trackable ????
lol, a unique tracking ID doesnt have to be built into the source, there are other ways to track the computer, still with universal checksums. lol you guys are old skeewl!! I am pretty sure if the new firmware wasnt trackable, a lot of people would have had it by now.

hemiola
03-22-2008, 08:24 PM
Or people are simply paranoid ? Who knows?!?!

chrisc9867
03-23-2008, 04:19 AM
Or people are simply paranoid ? Who knows?!?!

Well it isnt worth it for a company to get black listed by apple...

)law(
03-23-2008, 04:28 AM
a C&D is one thing but getting black listed by apple geez, well maybe they might have a shot a microsoft lol

iDarbert
03-23-2008, 03:39 PM
How are people so convinced that the Leopard betas were not trackable?
Do you have any proof that the opposite is true?

chrisc9867
03-23-2008, 08:27 PM
Do you have any proof that the opposite is true?

Do you have any proof that it is true? This can go on forever. Apparently, a few people got "busted and blacklisted" with the whole thing. All I am saying is that it isnt worth it for a company to take a chance.

iDarbert
03-23-2008, 09:52 PM
Do you have any proof that it is true? This can go on forever. Apparently, a few people got "busted and blacklisted" with the whole thing. All I am saying is that it isnt worth it for a company to take a chance.
All I know about busting is that someone was tracked after he uploaded his build from his hotel room during WWDC (I think it was on Oink, so go figure - super elite private tracker didn't help at all).

The "proof" I have (so that it doesn't go on forever) is that the first betas were handed out as DVDs in a booth that were previously prepared.
It's very unlikely they were compiled with the ADC username inside since they were reportedly "randomly handed from a box".
There also were several disk images floating around shared by different developers at that time and if I'm not mistaken they had the same checksum.

As for the people who got blacklisted I think they were discovered in another ways rather than some kind of signature inside the beta build.

As for companies not willing to take the risk I think that's the reason we won't be seeing 2.0/1.2 betas around the net.
This beta program is a lot more restricted compared to the Leopard Beta program where you just signed up, paid and got the beta - no approval required.

mac mini
03-24-2008, 12:52 AM
All I know about busting is that someone was tracked after he uploaded his build from his hotel room during WWDC (I think it was on Oink, so go figure - super elite private tracker didn't help at all).


heh.

i remember that. about a 100 page thread there.

ChronicProductions
03-24-2008, 05:36 AM
To stop all the bullshit, MD5s have been compared and it is not watermarked. For the record I never said it was, but didn't want people to think that it wasn't since we didn't know. Now stop the bitching and wait for the goddamn leak!

TwistyValhalla
03-24-2008, 06:28 AM
To stop all the bullshit, MD5s have been compared and it is not watermarked. For the record I never said it was, but didn't want people to think that it wasn't since we didn't know. Now stop the bitching and wait for the goddamn leak!

Thank you.. for putting a stop to this!

iDarbert
03-25-2008, 01:13 AM
To stop all the bullshit, MD5s have been compared and it is not watermarked. For the record I never said it was, but didn't want people to think that it wasn't since we didn't know. Now stop the bitching and wait for the goddamn leak!

Great, thanks.

Spinstorm
03-27-2008, 08:06 AM
I was wondering about the bootloader on the 1.2 beta?

Was it successfully updated using 3.9FB without any wierd downgraded bootloader issues? or other issues?

If any of you guys with it know?! Thanks.

celebi23
03-27-2008, 09:21 AM
I may have just received a good email from Apple ;) That's all I can say :p Now just to scrounge up the money :D

matt77
03-27-2008, 11:58 AM
Pwnage 1.2 IPSW coming this week end ?

http://www.iphoneatlas.com/2008/03/26/iphone-os-20-may-leak-publicly-soon/

detz
03-27-2008, 05:22 PM
Well, I installed everything last night and it erased everything on my phone. I guess I should have known this and all I lost was some images and all of my settings but still a pain. iTunes is also gone not sure why.

ChronicProductions
03-27-2008, 09:39 PM
Well, I installed everything last night and it erased everything on my phone. I guess I should have known this and all I lost was some images and all of my settings but still a pain. iTunes is also gone not sure why.

Hey man, you can get iTunes and App Stores by going to Settings > General > Parental Controls, turning them on, then turning the options for iTunes Store and App Store on and off once each. This is a known bug, at they will disappear again if you restart, at least they did for me. If you want them to stay, install this (http://www.modmyifone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=482971#post482971) on your iPhone, and go to Settings > Interface > Springboard > Show iTunes Store and Show App Store, then turn them both on.

captsoto
03-27-2008, 10:11 PM
Any reason why I cannot put anything bought at the itunes store on my phone? Says that I have a older version and need to click update in itunes. I have the most current version as of today. Ver 1.2 (5A147p) I can install non DRM content but i cannot download from the phone version of Itunes or the Desktop ver. Thanks for any help because God knows Apple never get back to you. and there is no place to go to talk to other developers to share and ask questions.

Thanks

Former Bender
03-27-2008, 10:14 PM
Beta version, it means it is only for development purpose.

detz
03-27-2008, 10:39 PM
New version of OS and SDK Released...

captsoto
03-27-2008, 10:54 PM
Beta version, it means it is only for development purpose.


I know what it means. Am i just supposed to throw my hands up and not ask if someone has found a way to get it to work? That does not mean I don't want and try and use the phone to its fullest during development. BTW the new firmware fixed it.

Former Bender
03-27-2008, 11:03 PM
BTW the new firmware fixed it.

Still Beta ;)

Spinstorm
03-28-2008, 12:01 AM
I was wondering about the bootloader on the 1.2 beta?

Was it successfully updated using 3.9FB without any wierd downgraded bootloader issues? or other issues?

mongoose8p
03-29-2008, 03:22 AM
Excuse me guys I have been of the forum for about a week now because I was out of town. Reading that last few posts did I miss something? Is the 1.2 firmware available for download. Please excuse me if im incorrect.

secretmrx
03-29-2008, 03:37 AM
Im looking foward to this and PWNED! i wonder when we will start seeing leaks floating around...

PathDaemon
03-31-2008, 09:44 PM
Saying "don't worry, sums have been compared" isn't good enough for me. I am the anti FUD.

I want public, out-in-the-open comparison.
So:

MD5 (iphone_os__iphone__5a225c.dmg) = eac0b73075ae3b1c****************
MD5 (iPhone1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = 8254ccf38735bc74****************

MD5 (iphone_os__ipod_touch__5a225c.dmg) = ****************c2b6306ac43a4662
MD5 (iPod1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = ****************75703f054db30997

Here's half of each MD5 sum. Someone else post the other half, we compare and find out once and for all of these packages are tagged.

ChronicProductions
03-31-2008, 10:01 PM
No, sums of the IPSW. The DMG could very well be watermarked.

PathDaemon
03-31-2008, 10:51 PM
No, sums of the IPSW. The DMG could very well be watermarked.

I'll edit my post to include them, but why would the IPSWs be any more or less watermarked than the DMGs?

ChronicProductions
03-31-2008, 10:59 PM
I'll edit my post to include them, but why would the IPSWs be any more or less watermarked than the DMGs?

It's not out of the realm of possibility that Apple is stupid enough to think people will just distribute the dmg instead of the ipsw itself, you never know :P

sam
03-31-2008, 11:44 PM
WEll that DMG is watermarked, I am very certain. Leoaprd DMG were watermarked, other beta given out by apple are.

Well, why watermark a dmg, not the content? It's simple. if you watermark the dmg, you would need to resign it every time to work with itunes, noone will do that, so you mark the dmg, which yu can append a signature to very easy.

Usally keys to sign something liek a ipsw are very well secured, no way they sign a ipsw for every developer indicidually or even on download in a insecure enviorment liek a webserver.

celebi23
04-01-2008, 01:08 AM
Saying "don't worry, sums have been compared" isn't good enough for me. I am the anti FUD.

I want public, out-in-the-open comparison.
So:

MD5 (iphone_os__iphone__5a225c.dmg) = eac0b73075ae3b1c****************
MD5 (iPhone1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = 8254ccf38735bc74****************

MD5 (iphone_os__ipod_touch__5a225c.dmg) = ****************c2b6306ac43a4662
MD5 (iPod1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = ****************75703f054db30997

Here's half of each MD5 sum. Someone else post the other half, we compare and find out once and for all of these packages are tagged.

MD5 iphone_os__iphone__5a225c.dmg = ****************0a3dcf4cfb7796e5
MD5 iPhone1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw = ****************b38fb432ce982081

MD5 iphone_os__ipod_touch__5a225c.dmg = 0d31077af263b8******************
MD5 iPod1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw = 5f8459c9dd9a2da0****************


Do with this what you will

PathDaemon
04-01-2008, 01:39 AM
With this information, I can conclude that the DMG files distributed of iPhone and iPod touch beta firmware are unique and may be traceable to the downloading ADC account. MD5 sums of both DMGs did not match, but I was unable to match any of the data sent to initiate the download with any information in my DMG.

It would be nice to get someone else's DMG for binary comparison to see where the differences lie, but not important.

However, sums of the IPSW files contained within the DMG did, in fact, match, so it is my opinion that they are not traceable. The complete sums of these IPSWs are below; if they don't correspond to what anyone else has, please make it known.

MD5 (iPhone1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = 8254ccf38735bc74b38fb432ce982081
MD5 (iPod1,1_2.0_5A225c_Restore.ipsw) = 5f8459c9dd9a2da075703f054db30997

So, yeah, in the words of celebi23…
Do with this what you will

.max
04-01-2008, 02:03 AM
I confirm ipsw is not signed. I think they have better things to do than sign each ipsw within dmg.
Maybe you should have posted only a few digits instead of the whole md5. Now anyone could claim they have the same md5 without any proof :)

And my DMG md5 does not match neither. It starts with 07...

I guess it's a matter of hours now before it breaks free to the bay.
It would be not usable however without pwnage.

Tyman07
04-01-2008, 02:38 AM
we need 1.2 to be public then!!!

ahduke99
04-01-2008, 05:25 AM
Dont Say That Here Or Death Is Imminent.

ubik
04-01-2008, 11:35 AM
so, now anyone has the beta ipsw. but nobody can uses it. nice. ? :confused:

DJ Destiny
04-01-2008, 01:09 PM
does anybody have the ramdisk key so that i can open the firmware on my mac ?

ChronicProductions
04-01-2008, 01:18 PM
does anybody have the ramdisk key so that i can open the firmware on my mac ?

http://chronic-dev.org/tools:vfdecryptkeysfor20beta

take your pick :)

ubik
04-01-2008, 01:23 PM
Get the vfdecrypt from here:
http://iphonedevwiki.scribblewiki.com/Break_DMG_Password

And use this command:
/vfdecrypt -i ***YOUR-DMG***.dmg -o decrypted.dmg -k ***THE-KEY-GOES-HERE***

hal
04-01-2008, 01:40 PM
...and that command, in conjunction with the keys, enables you to get fw which can be compiled into a ipsw (using the pwnage and other tools)?

Or am I waaaaaaay off..... Excuse me, this continues to be an interesting learning experience for me...:)

ubik
04-01-2008, 01:44 PM
...and that command, in conjunction with the keys, enables you to get fw which can be compiled into a ipsw (using the pwnage and other tools)?

Or am I waaaaaaay off..... Excuse me, this continues to be an interesting learning experience for me...:)


I don't know about that. But this command makes your *.dmg file mountable.
You need the key from chronic, and the *.dmg of the .ipsw file. after you did this. you have the dmg mounted on your mac. and see the whole file system from the iphone fw.

hal
04-01-2008, 01:59 PM
I don't know about that. But this command makes your *.dmg file of 2.0 beta mountable.
You need the key from chronic, and the *.dmg of the 2.0.ipsw file. after you did this. you have the dmg mounted on your mac. and see the whole file system from the iphone 2.0 fw.

I see....Thanks Ubik. Like I say, I'm still learning...:cool:

ubik
04-01-2008, 03:07 PM
I see....Thanks Ubik. Like I say, I'm still learning...:cool:

no problem mate. i've never done this before ;)

Solt
04-01-2008, 04:52 PM
can anyone from DevTeam answer-WHEN EXACTLY PWNING WILL BE RELEASED?
THANKS.

kultschar
04-01-2008, 05:11 PM
can anyone from DevTeam answer-WHEN EXACTLY PWNING WILL BE RELEASED?
THANKS.


This week sometime when they have finished coding the Windows version I guess!!!

Solt
04-01-2008, 08:23 PM
Man.. Come on thats WAREZ. XianLi may ban you...

ChronicProductions
04-01-2008, 09:55 PM
yeah you probably will he infracted me just for telling people that it existed and for saying not to upgrade because it is no use

ipod touch fan
04-01-2008, 10:51 PM
so.. lets say i have it... from a leak version.. how can de-activate the activation thing..?
i really wanna know.. i know ziphone wont work.. but.. u know..

MJ29
04-01-2008, 10:59 PM
Nothing will work for you to activate it. You would need some program to create a ram disk for it and the change the code to point from the ram disk to the ipsw to make it run. Then you have to try to find a way to get around activation.

ipod touch fan
04-01-2008, 11:21 PM
k... well.. maybe a decrypted firmware will work.. that way i can de-activate the activation thing. then re-upload it to my ipod touch...:eek:

xSNOWCAT
04-02-2008, 12:11 AM
Did 2.0 leak? i read some places that it did just wanted to know

romeo0569
04-02-2008, 12:30 AM
Did 2.0 leak? i read some places that it did just wanted to know

do some more reading in some more places and you will see that it did in fact leak.

xSNOWCAT
04-02-2008, 12:57 AM
yea but how did it leak there's no leaks or torrents to it

PathDaemon
04-02-2008, 01:35 AM
yea but how did it leak there's no leaks

http://www.forumammo.com/cpg/albums/userpics/10071/normal_picard-no-facepalm.jpg

If you can't find it on your own, you probably shouldn't be screwing with iPhones anyway, and asking for it here is just plain silly. See? Last couple of posts were already deleted.

)law(
04-02-2008, 02:07 AM
NO WAREZ:mad: :mad: :mad:

xSNOWCAT
04-02-2008, 02:16 AM
wil this work to be unlocked and activated with Pwnage?

Former Bender
04-02-2008, 02:35 AM
Do not post or ask links to download the 2.0 or you'll get banned

romeo0569
04-02-2008, 02:47 AM
wil this work to be unlocked and activated with Pwnage?

are you joking? can you read? do some reasearch...see that little button on top that says search? well click on it and type PWNAGE....i also suggest you watch the pwnage presentation video. stop asking questions. stop being lazy and read for yourself.

ipod touch fan
04-02-2008, 04:21 AM
noone has answer my question.. how can u get pass the activation... saying that i had the firmware...

romeo0569
04-02-2008, 05:06 AM
noone has answer my question.. how can u get pass the activation... saying that i had the firmware...

are u litterate? can u read? YOU CANNOT GET PAST ACTIVATION WITHOUT PWNAGE TOOL! please...i cannot stress this enough, READ BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS!

nvydis
04-02-2008, 05:58 AM
im screwed....im crossing my fingers the pwnage tool comes out in windows. i upgraded last night but it was too late =(. i misread someone saying ziphone will unlock 2.0 but it doesnt. now im stuck.

Solt
04-02-2008, 08:38 AM
noone has answer my question.. how can u get pass the activation... saying that i had the firmware...

Well,without Pwning YOUR iTouch,I guess you cant do this... By the way i noticed some strange facts,when you restore-it says that iTunes cant identify me as a developer,but when I do jailbreak with Ziphone,it SEES MY ITOUCH..,BUT the screen is purple anyways.....

are u litterate? can u read? YOU CANNOT GET PAST ACTIVATION WITHOUT PWNAGE TOOL! please...i cannot stress this enough, READ BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS!

WELL FIRST OF ALL STOP SHOUTING!!!!!
Secondly simply explain to a person,who do NOT understand the situation....

romeo0569
04-02-2008, 09:09 AM
Well,without Pwning YOUR iTouch,I guess you cant do this... By the way i noticed some strange facts,when you restore-it says that iTunes cant identify me as a developer,but when I do jailbreak with Ziphone,it SEES MY ITOUCH..,BUT the screen is purple anyways.....



WELL FIRST OF ALL STOP SHOUTING!!!!!
Secondly simply explain to a person,who do NOT understand the situation....

Solt, i completely agree with you. we should simply explain to a person that doesnt understand...however, if the person does a little bit of reading, there would be no need for explanation. its always better to learn on your own. and i wasnt shouting lol simply caps lock so that he or she can see :D

DirectBrasil
04-02-2008, 02:48 PM
im screwed....im crossing my fingers the pwnage tool comes out in windows. i upgraded last night but it was too late =(. i misread someone saying ziphone will unlock 2.0 but it doesnt. now im stuck.

You are not screwed... There is a plan to do it.

Nevertheless, Why stick to Windows ? Have both !

Solt
04-02-2008, 03:45 PM
See this thread,will help. Worked for me anyways. http://www.hackint0sh.org/forum/showthread.php?p=269081#post269081

romeo0569
04-02-2008, 06:50 PM
im screwed....im crossing my fingers the pwnage tool comes out in windows. i upgraded last night but it was too late =(. i misread someone saying ziphone will unlock 2.0 but it doesnt. now im stuck.

add the iclarified source in installer, there is a new baseband eraser. use it and then restore to 1.1.4

Solt
04-02-2008, 07:16 PM
Xianli Said,but I Will Repeat Again. No Download Links Here!
Post A Link=banned!

thecompkid
04-02-2008, 10:01 PM
so, now anyone has the beta ipsw. but nobody can uses it. nice. ? :confused:

You're not supposed to have 2.0 until June, I suggest you reevaluate your opinion.

ubik
04-03-2008, 10:26 AM
You're not supposed to have 2.0 until June, I suggest you reevaluate your opinion.

Thats not what I said kid. I said that because of the "YEEEY's" and "YIIIHAW's". And nobody can uses it for real.

mwkoblenz
04-03-2008, 05:21 PM
Can someone please PM me a link where to download 2.0 firmware. Thanks

chuna
04-03-2008, 05:36 PM
Anyone with 2.0, how does Microsoft Exchange work with this. THis is all I actually need beside the phone functions.

DJ McG
04-03-2008, 06:26 PM
I have the torrent link and I am downloadng it now, when winpwnage comes out I may try upgrading. Google is your friend

jeg815
04-03-2008, 06:40 PM
Can someone please PM me the link? Thanks in advance.:)

DJ McG
04-03-2008, 06:50 PM
use google and search iPhone 2.0 leaked firmware beta, I got it from the bay of pirates if you know what um saying and you are familiar with torrents

jeg815
04-03-2008, 06:54 PM
Thanks, I understand what you're saying. I'll check it out:)

goodluck4287
04-09-2008, 01:42 AM
New version seeded. Perhaps a new topic?

From MacRumors:

Apple Seeds New iPhone OS 2.0 Beta (5A240d), SDK Update (Beta 3)

Goines
04-09-2008, 06:56 AM
Hopefully the new 5A240D beta 3 firmware will be available in similar ways. I live by exchange access, and welcome all updates!

.max
04-12-2008, 08:56 PM
It has leaked to the bay...

kramer2k
04-13-2008, 02:07 AM
Green demon too...

osldwm
04-22-2008, 09:40 PM
OK here is the deal.

I work for a global company. We have been selected to participate in the BETA testing. I live in Oslo, and have the old 4 GB version that is hacked of course. I had the 1.1.4 version on it (hacked with ZiPhone) Worked like a charm. Last night I figured I could install the BETA 2.0 on my iphone. Figured if it didn't work, then I could just downgrade back to 1.1.4.

:hack: So installed 2.0, ZiPhones it, got it working, but had no SIM connectivity. Couldn't get a connection to my carrier. Couldn't connect to iTunes and update anything. Got the error about TLS and SSL 1. So I figured that the BETA wouldn't work for me, so I went back to 1.1.4. Got this installed, ZiPhoned it, and still same issue. So now I have a BRICK. Can surf with it, and that's about it. SIM card is registered on the phone, since it ask for the PIN code, I enter it, and it says accepted. But still no contact with the my provider. Nor can I connect it to iTunes, unless I put it in restore mode. :eek:

So as you all can see, I am shit out of luck...


Any tips, ideas, anything I can test out for you guys? Let me know ASAP.
DWM :confused:

mikrohard
04-22-2008, 10:49 PM
Ziphone does NOT support 2.0 beta. You should use pwnage. But first you need to delete or unlock the 2.0 beta baseband (which stays even if you restore the phone to 1.1.4). Search in the unlock section to find out how to do it...

shane_pcs
04-23-2008, 12:13 AM
Easy, put your phone in restore mode and pwn it. Then install a custom 1.1.4 ipsw file. Should be up and running then.

osldwm
04-23-2008, 11:33 AM
shane_pcs.... thx for the feedback. But I got to ask you....

I am using a PC (windows) to do this. Isn't pwn for MAC? If not, where can I download it. Right now I am able to start the iphone. I have version 1.1.4, but the modem firmware is still 04.05.01. This seems to be the whole reason for the problem right? Can you step by step guide me to what to do here?

sh4508
04-23-2008, 02:24 PM
I got 2.0 (5A240d) from torrent, it is relatively more stable than the previous 2.0 beta, also much faster.

Have the 2.0 pwned and installed for a few days, and using the iPhone 2.0 together with the iPhone SDK, installing most of the SDK sample apps (more than 12 apps), quite stable. Probably because by using PwnageTool you can bypass the need to have the application signed, it is relatively easy and straight forward to install apps into the iPhone (using iPhone SDK X Code).

Features that I like most: contact search, and picture save (from Safari & mail), screen shot.

Other features that I haven't used: MS Exchange push mail, VPN (including for Cisco), and since I am not using AT&T, no iTunes. I am using Indonesian telco (Indo XL and Telkomsel).

Will have to stay on 2.0 for iPhone SDK testing purposes. Will probably test dual boot 1.1.4/2.0 if any of you can advise me the thread that refer to it.

mikrohard
04-23-2008, 03:20 PM
shane_pcs.... thx for the feedback. But I got to ask you....

I am using a PC (windows) to do this. Isn't pwn for MAC? If not, where can I download it. Right now I am able to start the iphone. I have version 1.1.4, but the modem firmware is still 04.05.01. This seems to be the whole reason for the problem right? Can you step by step guide me to what to do here?

Read this thread to find a solution:
http://www.hackint0sh.org/forum/showthread.php?t=36221&highlight=04.05.01

Evilhomer
04-23-2008, 04:53 PM
What are some of the SDK test apps? That's the first I've heard of them. I'm not an "official" tester of course. :D

jashsayani
04-23-2008, 04:53 PM
Thanks for the news...

I have the first 2.0 beta. will get the newer version !!!


:)

sh4508
04-25-2008, 02:11 PM
What are some of the SDK test apps? That's the first I've heard of them. I'm not an "official" tester of course. :D

Here are the apps on my iPhone with 2.0 firmware 5A240d: GLSprite, GLGravity, GLTeapot, FingerSketch, Kalimba, Metronome, Touches, UIShowcase, SQLiteBooks, SeismicXML, WhichWayIsUp, ViewTransitions, TheElements, Reachability, HelloClassic, QuartzDemo, MoveMe, GestureWatch, WiTap, and a few others.

This morning, I have downloaded LunarLander (for beta 4), and having installed beta 4 SDK on my MacBook. However, have to wait for firmware 5A258f to be installed or Pwned on my iPhone to test LunarLander.

Remember, according to iPhone SDK beta4 Readme: only signed apps will be able to be installed in iPhone, but you can test it using iPhone Simulator. Will wait to test using Pwned firmware, if PwnageTool would be able to bypass the apps signing.

Evilhomer
04-25-2008, 05:51 PM
Thanks for the reply sh4508.

Do you have to be an official tester to have access to those apps? Do you have to have the SDK to load them. Sorry for all the questions.

celebi23
04-25-2008, 10:04 PM
This morning, I have downloaded LunarLander (for beta 4

Where did you get LunarLander for SDK Beta 4? It's not on Sample Code page :confused: It hasn't been available since Beta 2

sh4508
04-26-2008, 07:43 AM
@Evilhomer: Yes, I am an official developer as of Mar 8, 2008.

@celebi23: LunarLander is there at apple.com. You have to access from the email you received from them re new iPhone SDK availability, enter your password, there you are.

celebi23
04-27-2008, 10:09 AM
@Evilhomer: Yes, I am an official developer as of Mar 8, 2008.

@celebi23: LunarLander is there at apple.com. You have to access from the email you received from them re new iPhone SDK availability, enter your password, there you are.

:confused: I'm a registered iPhone Dev & never received any email from Apple about iPhone SDK Beta 4. :confused: Any way you could shoot me a PM about LunarLander? ;)

edit: So it is on the site, you just need to change the url of one of the other sample code pages to "LunarLander" & there is the updated version for Beta 4

jashsayani
04-29-2008, 12:14 PM
Finally downloaded the latest Fw 2.0. Its Great !!!

All Bugs Fixed and new cool features like Searching contacts and Importing SIM contacts.

My AppStore works !!


______________________________________________

For iPhone News / Updates, visit:
My Blog: http://theifoneblog.blogspot.com

patvg
04-29-2008, 02:06 PM
Finally downloaded the latest Fw 2.0. Its Great !!!

All Bugs Fixed and new cool features like Searching contacts and Importing SIM contacts.

My AppStore works !!


______________________________________________

For iPhone News / Updates, visit:
My Blog: http://theifoneblog.blogspot.com


I suppose your foot-note (2.0 beta pwned) does not mean 2.0 beta4 but 2.0 beta3 ?
If you do have beta4 pwned and working, can you explain how ?

MrIron
04-29-2008, 05:56 PM
SIM import and contact browsing was in the 3rd beta? wasn't it?

volkspost
05-01-2008, 12:42 PM
SIM import and contact browsing was in the 3rd beta? wasn't it?

correct, thats been there since beta 3

volkspost

Leshenka
05-02-2008, 10:08 AM
Does A2DP-profile works on beta 3 or 4?

ChronicProductions
05-02-2008, 09:28 PM
Does A2DP-profile works on beta 3 or 4?

Nope, I ran a few tests and bluetooth is the same

kreiselkreisch
05-05-2008, 08:38 PM
iPhone1,1_2.0_5A258f_Restore.ipsw has been leaked on torrent sites

hal
05-05-2008, 08:44 PM
So, I see from Chronic's site that it will work without pwnage on AT&T valid iPhones.

My questions are (if anyone would be so kind!):

1. Will this work on a pwned (but not official) o2 handset?
2. Will it work on an AT&T handset that has never been used with AT&T?


thank you!

volkspost
05-05-2008, 09:21 PM
So, I see from Chronic's site that it will work without pwnage on AT&T valid iPhones.

My questions are (if anyone would be so kind!):

1. Will this work on a pwned (but not official) o2 handset?
2. Will it work on an AT&T handset that has never been used with AT&T?


thank you!

As Chronic states on the site you mentioned "only legit AT&T". So the answers are no/no.
Check the post from planetbeing at

http://hackint0sh.org/forum/showthread.php?t=39962&page=2

update of PwnageTool is under construction.

volkspost

hal
05-05-2008, 10:55 PM
As Chronic states on the site you mentioned "only legit AT&T". So the answers are no/no.
Check the post from planetbeing at

http://hackint0sh.org/forum/showthread.php?t=39962&page=2

update of PwnageTool is under construction.

volkspost

Much obliged, volkspost.

Evilhomer
05-05-2008, 11:44 PM
I did a search on this but found nothing relevant. After installing the Beta 4, my ringtones are playing at what seems to be half speed. Has anyone else noticed this. Other than this, my device is running very smoothly and the EAS is terrific.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

libertybenz2
05-05-2008, 11:50 PM
I did a search on this but found nothing relevant. After installing the Beta 4, my ringtones are playing at what seems to be half speed. Has anyone else noticed this. Other than this, my device is running very smoothly and the EAS is terrific.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Go back two pages Evilhomer...i could swear i read someone was having a similar problem. I think they said it would play fast, then slow. I dont know, but seems like the same problem.

Guys, without installer/third party apps, is it even WORTH going to 1.2 at this point in time?? I think not. I was considering it, but i have t-mob lol So i rather just stick to the way things are for now, until they figure out a new firmware with the same capabilities of 1.2, but allowing third party apps (sort of like what they did for the PSP) lol

Benz

Evilhomer
05-05-2008, 11:54 PM
Thanks for the reply Liberty.

As for your question about moving to 1.2 without apps, it just all depends on what is more important to you. Unless you are needing Exchange sync for push mail, calendar, and contacts support, there is really no need to update. I like that apps but the Exchange Active Sync support is more important for me right now than the applications.

I'd say stick with what you've got unless you are in a position that you need push mail.

dtube
05-06-2008, 12:26 AM
Even so, the exchange sync is very flaky for me.
Cisco vpn is spotty.
IMHO, not worth to go to 2.0B3 at this time.

Evilhomer
05-06-2008, 12:30 AM
That's odd. I'm having a really good experience with Exchange right now. Granted, I've only had it going since this morning but I get a good deal of mail.

dtube
05-06-2008, 07:31 AM
I know ... That's why it's Beta ... results varied.
My mail sort of sync ok, but contacts did not sync completely. I get partial. First time I tried it, sync may be 25% of my contacts. Second time I tried from scratch again, it sync exactly one contact. No matter what I tried, it will not sync my contacts correctly.

sh4508
05-11-2008, 04:15 PM
With beta 3 5A240d approaching May 15 expiry date, really hoping that PwnageTool update is coming soon, as I already have the beta 4 5A258f and beta 5 5A274d. Trying LunarLander from beta 4 requires codesigning. Otherwise, have to go back to 1.1.4.

Hashish
05-19-2008, 12:49 PM
PwnageTool patches the Expired state in the lockdownd so you don't have to worry about them expiring.

jashsayani
05-19-2008, 12:58 PM
Ya I am waiting for the new Pwnage Tool (v 1.2) too... I just got the new Beta 5 Firmware... :)

Jazz2k8
05-19-2008, 10:36 PM
Ya I am waiting for the new Pwnage Tool (v 1.2) too... I just got the new Beta 5 Firmware... :)

I had this 3rd day after the release.. however have you got a custom firmware of this to bypass the dev certificate?

Iv decrypted the firmware.. but don't know what else to do after this... il carry on researching the great world wide web... :hack:

Former Bender
07-11-2008, 04:30 PM
2.0 released, thread closed